Author Topic: Russian Iron Blue C-19  (Read 2596 times)

SundayNiagara

  • President
  • Conductor
  • *****
  • Posts: 247
    • View Profile
Russian Iron Blue C-19
« on: April 15, 2012, 01:07:34 PM »
Blackstone posted this last night on Facebook!
Mark

Bernd

  • Guest
Re: Russian Iron Blue C-19
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2012, 08:03:32 PM »
Mark,

Nice looking engine. Going to have to save up some coins to start an HOn3 stable.

Bernd

SundayNiagara

  • President
  • Conductor
  • *****
  • Posts: 247
    • View Profile
Re: Russian Iron Blue C-19
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2012, 08:20:00 AM »
I have one reserved.
Mark

jackpine savage

  • Brakeman
  • **
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
Re: Russian Iron Blue C-19
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2012, 12:57:57 AM »
That would make a great free-lancing locomotive.

Batey

  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: Russian Iron Blue C-19
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2012, 09:56:50 PM »
I notice on the blackstone site they just have it listed as Diamond stack 2-8-0 and call it freelanced.
Still would make a nice logging loco i think.
Anyone know how they would handle a no.5 turnout. The spec says they oporate on 18" radius

On second thoughts it would be cheaper for me to buy an older c-19 and just repaint and change the stack since i would be reapintng one of these anyway.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2012, 10:00:22 PM by Batey »
Cheers Adrian

HOn3 Logging Modeler from Down Under

SundayNiagara

  • President
  • Conductor
  • *****
  • Posts: 247
    • View Profile
Re: Russian Iron Blue C-19
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2013, 09:08:52 PM »
I notice on the blackstone site they just have it listed as Diamond stack 2-8-0 and call it freelanced.
Still would make a nice logging loco i think.
Anyone know how they would handle a no.5 turnout. The spec says they oporate on 18" radius

On second thoughts it would be cheaper for me to buy an older c-19 and just repaint and change the stack since i would be reapintng one of these anyway.

It's smaller than a K-27, so it shouldn't have a problem with a #5.